Commentaries on American Law (1826-30)Chancellor James Kent Of Estates In Reversion
NOTES

     1.    Co. Litt. 142. b.
     2.    Vol. i. 723. sec. 12
     3.    Co. Litt. 22. b.
     4.    See supra, p. 10.12.
     5.    2 Comm. 175.
     6.    Gentoo Code, by Halhed, p. 153.
     7.    Litt. sec. 567, 568. Co. Litt. ibid. Co. Litt. 49. a. Doe v. Cole. 7 Barnw. & Cress. 243. Mr. Preston says, it is more usual to pass a reversion by lease and release, or bargain and sale. Preston on Abstracts, vol. ii. 85.
     8.    Smith v. Angel, 1 Salk. Rep. 354. Villers v. Handley, 2 Wils. Rep. 49.
     9.    Holt, Ch. J., in Kellow v. Rowden, Carth. Rep. 129. Rook v, Clealand, 1 Lord Raym. 53.
   10.    1 Rol. Abr. 269. A. pl. 2. Kellow v. Rouden, Carth. 126. 3 Mod. Rep. 253. S. C.
   11.    2.Atk. Rep. 204. Forrest. MS. cited in Cruise's Dig. tit. Reversion, sec. 26.
   12.    Symonds v. Cudmore, 4 Mod. Rep. 1. Shelburne v. Biddulph. 4 Bro. P. C. 594.
   13.    Jesser v. Gifford, 4 Burr. 2141.
   14.    Jackson v. Peaked,1 Maule & Selw. 234. Randall v. Cleveland. 6 Conn. Rep. 328.
   15.    Co. Litt. 143. a. 151. a. b.